Comparison of the reliability-based and safety factor methods for structural design | |
Wang XJ; Shi QH; Fan WC; Wang RX(王睿星); Wang L | |
Corresponding Author | Wang, Xiaojun([email protected]) |
Source Publication | APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING |
2019-08-01 | |
Volume | 72Pages:68-84 |
ISSN | 0307-904X |
Abstract | Reliability-based design optimization theory has been widely acknowledged as an advanced and advantageous methodology for complex structural system design. Comparatively, the traditional safety factor design method has fallen out of favor with designers since it is simply just a comprehensive expression of all the uncertainties existing in a practical engineering structure, which has been verified to be unreasonable. Moreover, there is no description of the method for searching for the optimal design. In this paper, a comparison of the two approaches is performed for the optimization results and process. It is demonstrated that the weight of the designed structure by the reliability based optimization is not heavier than that by the safety factor design method under the same reliability requirements. The time efficiency, error estimates and sensitivity analysis are also compared to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches. Eventually, the advancement of the reliability-based design optimization is illustrated with optimization designs of a two-bar truss and one practical supersonic wing. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Keyword | Safety factor method Reliability-based design optimization Structural design Uncertainty |
DOI | 10.1016/j.apm.2019.03.018 |
Indexed By | SCI ; EI |
Language | 英语 |
WOS ID | WOS:000470051900005 |
WOS Keyword | RESPONSE ANALYSIS ; DYNAMIC-RESPONSE ; PARAMETERS ; OPTIMIZATION ; UNCERTAINTY ; SENSITIVITY ; CRITERIA ; SYSTEMS ; MODEL |
WOS Research Area | Engineering ; Mathematics ; Mechanics |
WOS Subject | Engineering, Multidisciplinary ; Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications ; Mechanics |
Funding Project | National Key Research and Development Program[2016YFB0200700] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[11572024] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[11872089] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[11432002] ; Defense Industrial Technology Development Program[JCKY2016601B001] ; Defense Industrial Technology Development Program[JCKY2017601B001] ; Defense Industrial Technology Development Program[JCKY2017208B001] ; Postgraduate Innovation Practice Fund of Beihang University[YCSJ-01-2018-07] |
Funding Organization | National Key Research and Development Program ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; Defense Industrial Technology Development Program ; Postgraduate Innovation Practice Fund of Beihang University |
Classification | 二类/Q1 |
Ranking | 4 |
Contributor | Wang, Xiaojun |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | 期刊论文 |
Identifier | http://dspace.imech.ac.cn/handle/311007/79319 |
Collection | 流固耦合系统力学重点实验室 |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Wang XJ,Shi QH,Fan WC,et al. Comparison of the reliability-based and safety factor methods for structural design[J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING,2019,72:68-84.Rp_Au:Wang, Xiaojun |
APA | Wang XJ,Shi QH,Fan WC,王睿星,&Wang L.(2019).Comparison of the reliability-based and safety factor methods for structural design.APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING,72,68-84. |
MLA | Wang XJ,et al."Comparison of the reliability-based and safety factor methods for structural design".APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING 72(2019):68-84. |
Files in This Item: | Download All | |||||
File Name/Size | DocType | Version | Access | License | ||
Jp2019202.pdf(1921KB) | 期刊论文 | 出版稿 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | View Download |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment